Posted Oct 10#2
Comet · 212 points
Owner
47
ide tend to avoid driver based spoofers, but it doeant mean they do not work.
Is a driver spoofer good ?
By skythOct 10, 2026 in General Discussion · 22 views
Comet · 181 points
Member
8
So, I’ve seen a lot of people talking about getting flagged for minor things like TPM issues, messed-up MSInfo, and stuff like that. I personally use a driver-based spoofer that covers everything from disk IDs to CPU IDs, including a lot of identifiers that a permanent spoofer might not cover.
However, people still seem hesitant about driver-based spoofers. Why is that? I’ve personally never had any issues with spoofer detection, and mine comes signed and claims to bypass HVCI and Secure Boot. I honestly don’t understand why so many people would rather buy an entirely new PC instead of considering an alternative like this. Is there something I’m missing?
Posted Oct 11#3
Comet · 124 points
Developer
116
Yeah I get why you question it bc urs is working fine rn. If it works it works. But the reason people in the DMA community are so hesitant about driver based spoofers isnt because they wanna be difficult its because people buy dma to have the lowest chance of ban yk.
The whole goal of investing in a dma card second pc firmware etc is to have zero software footprint on ur gaming pc.
When you have a driver based spoofer into that, you are defeating the purpose of your dma card.
Its a detection vector and cat and mouse game like regular cheats even dma firmware that is avoidable unlike software and dma detection.
People choose the "hard" route because they dont wanna add a detection vector that can be avoided making you more "undetected".
AuthorPosted Oct 11#4
Comet · 181 points
Member
8
I mean, I get the detection part, but I think the amount of money you'll save and what you get in return is worth it. And for detection, spoofer drivers are fine if they're high quality — on the same level as RDMA — a signed driver running in the background that doesn't interfere with any anti-cheat protected processes.
Posted Oct 11#5
Comet · 124 points
Developer
116
Youre not really saving money, all you need to do is, atleast what i have in my setup.
I have fuser and a edid emulator device that when you press the button on it, it copys whatever edid is plugged into it so I flash my second monitors spoofed edid on fuser plug fuser into edid emulator then flash my main monitor spoofed edid back onto fuser and both monitors spoofed.
For peripherals you can get microcontrollers to spoof them and act as a interposer, or just buy new ones and return your old ones its cheap. For ram if you have ram sticks that have serials which is like 50% you can buy new ram that has no serials or buy the same ram and return your old. For TPM, its easy on AMD, intel I dont know. For GPU UUID, if this is the only banned thing in your pc, youre fine and no need to replace/return.
Its not about that its undetected its about the fact that it can be detected when it doesnt need to be added as a detection vector RDMA makes sense because in the long run any DMA will get detected but for spoofing it doesnt need to be like that yk?
Sign in to reply.